OptimonCoreSync Studio
IE
OPS-VIEW-10

Developer handover

Everything a developer needs to implement the acquisition operations layer for real: where each definition lives in this build, what it already states, and exactly which fields are still outstanding.

As of 2026-09-23T06:00Z (virtual scenario clock)Window trailing 720 minTimezone Asia/Kolkata (UTC+05:30), displayed in UTCDataset ops-seed-0.7.0 · run SR-0007-baselineenvironmentMode: simulation
Simulated acquisition operations. These artifacts describe studio definitions. They do not constitute a production integration, and nothing here qualifies a native adapter in an environment.

Handover artifacts

ArtifactWhere it livesIn-app viewOutstanding
HO-1 Metric & event contractsrc/lib/ops/metrics.ts + src/lib/ops/model.tsopenReconcile the fifteen proposed identifiers with official Optimon 9 metric names; confirm the freshness rule per source family with the platform team.
HO-2 Structured diagnostic schemasrc/lib/ops/model.ts (DiagnosticEvent)openVendor code mapping table per connector family is still empty; only the neutral code set is defined.
HO-3 Alert rule packsrc/lib/ops/alerts.ts (ALERT_RULES)openService class thresholds per site have not been agreed; current values are illustrative defaults.
HO-4 Incident model & runbookssrc/lib/ops/alerts.ts (INCIDENT_STATES, RUNBOOKS)openEscalation ownership beyond the Operations Lead is not defined; no on-call roster exists in the studio.
HO-5 Report definitionssrc/lib/ops/reports.tsopenRetention and distribution policy for generated reports is undecided; nothing is scheduled or delivered.
HO-6 Acceptance scenario packsrc/lib/ops/scenarios.tsopenScenarios assert studio behaviour on synthetic inputs. They are not native adapter qualification.
HO-7 Dataset provenancesrc/lib/ops/events.tsopenReal event volumes and cardinalities are unknown; the simulated fleet is not a capacity estimate.
HO-8 Outstanding decisionsthis pageopenTracked as an open list below; each item names who must decide it.

Open decisions this workspace cannot settle by itself

DecisionQuestionOwnerImpact
OPS-DEC-01Which freshness rule applies per source family, and who owns it?Platform + operationsChanges OPS-M-07 and alert rule OPS-AR-01 directly.
OPS-DEC-02Can a source declare an expected-member denominator for polled APIs and event pushes?Integration engineeringWithout it, completeness stays not measurable for those families rather than assumed complete.
OPS-DEC-03Are the proposed OPS-M / OPS-AR identifiers acceptable, or must they map onto existing O9 names?Optimon 9 platform teamThe studio never invents official identifiers; these stay in the studio namespace until reconciled.
OPS-DEC-04What retention applies to intake payloads, and does it allow reprocess under a new mapping version?GovernanceDetermines whether reprocess is available as a recovery operation at all.
OPS-DEC-05Who may authorise recovery that reads a historical window from a live source?Operations + securityBackfill reads a source; replay does not. The authority model differs.
OPS-DEC-06Which consumer contracts define delivery due times used by OPS-M-10 and OPS-AR-02?Delivery + consumersCurrently derived from the simulated obligations, not from agreed service classes.

Studio readiness vs production integration

Studio readinessDefined, interactive and scenario-tested for this layer. Tracked on the readiness ledgers.
Production integrationunassessed — no source confirmed, no runtime implemented, no environment qualified
Datasetops-seed-0.7.0 · scenario run SR-0007-baseline
Definition packacquisition operations pack v0.7